MLC
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hello Nicolas, most–but not all–versions of Baskerville contain a numeral ‘5’ of this style, though I am not sure which version is used on this memorial. There are many, many versions of Baskerville.
Hello John, it’s possible this was/is a commercially available typeface, but it also might be an old concrete stamping letter set made exclusively for that purpose and was never digitized.
I’ve not seen a font that shares all of the characteristics of the lettering on the memorial in your photo, but if you just need something close I would do a search for “typewriter fonts” or “slab serif fonts”.
If the client would like to match it exactly it will need to be done manually, feel free to use the MLC matching service: https://www.monumentletteringcenter.com/product/cemetery-inscription-matching-service/
Hi Nicolas, this is actually a font called Cheltenham Bold
Hello Nicolas, unsure of this lettering style, and it is possibly hand-drawn, though it is difficult to tell.
This is almost certainly a hand-drawn letter style or perhaps a very rare blueprint alphabet and will need to be custom matched.
Feel free to use the matching service if you’d like help: https://www.monumentletteringcenter.com/product/cemetery-inscription-matching-service/
This appears to be a somewhat poorly digitized version of Helvetica. The exact version looks like it may be “Helvetica Light” in the Monu-Cad software.
Yes, this is definitely not a style that was available as a reproducible letter set at the time. It does appear fairly consistent, but looking closely there are some slight differences from letter to letter so it is almost certainly hand cut.
Feel free to use the matching service if you would like help matching this inscription: https://www.monumentletteringcenter.com/product/cemetery-inscription-matching-service/
Hello John, this is a common issue with hand-cut lettering, as the boldness of the letter depended on whether the stencil cutter followed just inside or just outside of the lines on the stencil with the knife blade. Even the angle of the knife blade can make a difference if it was not held completely vertical. Sometimes the Spacerite letters would be used but a slightly bolder letter was desired so a conscious effort was made to thicken up the letters, so there can be a lot of variance.
You’ll need to consult the Flexi Sign manual on page 59 to see instructions on adding an outline to a font in order to make it bolder. Below is a link to a Flexi manual: https://www.thinkmutoh.com/wp-content/uploads/articulate_uploads/MUTOH-FlexiSIGN-Webinar-Marathon-Replay1/story_content/external_files/NEW%20Flexi%20Training%20Manual.pdf
This is a font called Egyptienne 505 Bold, though it looks like it may have been manually condensed.
This appears to be a digital version of the Classic Roman alphabet. I’ve never seen this exact version before, but it is very similar to the Spacerite Classic Roman, which contains the spur on the ‘G’ as on your rubbing. However, not all of the characters match the Spacerite version, including the ‘M’, ‘A’, 2, and zero–which are all more similar to the Spacerite Modified Roman alphabet. It is possible this is a custom digital version where some changes have been made.
Here is a link to the MLC’s version of the Spacerite Classic Roman: https://www.monumentletteringcenter.com/product/mlc-spacerite-classic-roman/
Hello Jill, this is a version of Bookman called Bookman Old Style: https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/mti/bookman-old-style/std-roman/
Hi Brian, this is a font called Le Griffe: https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/itc/le-griffe/
This appears to be a slightly modified SKS Double Outline (without the second outline). Slightly bolder than the traditional Modified or Classic Roman, it appears that some of the spurs may have been manually cut off, which are present on the numeral ‘1’, ‘2’, and ‘4’ of the original alphabet. The numeral ‘4’ is the giveaway when identifying this alphabet, with the serif on the crossbar being so tight up against the stem.
